Difference between revisions of "Nature of Christ"

From Nazarani
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
The philosophical debate between the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monophysitism Monophysites], the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nestorianism Nestorians], and the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Orthodox_Church Eastern Orthodox] as to the true "'''Nature of Christ'''” is based solely on philosophical arguments which are not found anywhere in the scriptures.
+
A philosophical debate continues between the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monophysitism Monophysites], the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nestorianism Nestorians], and the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Orthodox_Church Eastern Orthodox] as to the true "'''Nature of Christ'''”. And while this argument may seem insignificant, one shouldn't loose sight of the fact that millions of people have lost their lives, and  many more have been exiled from their homes as the result of it.
  
This is a problem of the Hellenized church, which does not directly effect Nazarani, because our view of the faith isn't based on pagan philosophical interpretations, but instead on a spiritual understanding of God, which has been passed down to us through the scriptures in their original Aramaic language. Once again, Aramaic is the key to uncovering the real meaning and spiritual interpretation of the scriptures. This argument may seem insignificant to us right now, but one shouldn't loose sight of the fact that millions of people have been killed and exiled from their homes as the result of it.
+
To be clear, this is a problem of the Hellenized church, which does not directly effect Nazarani. That's because our view of the faith isn't based on a spiritual understanding of God, which has been passed down to us through the scriptures in their original Aramaic language, which is perfectly clear, and doesn't require hurdles of logic to fully understand.
  
There are a few words which must be understood before undertaking to understand the nature of Christ as it is revealed in Aramaic.
+
There are a three Aramaic idioms which must understood before we can proceed. After all, the deaths of more than a million persons occurred because the Greek redactors of the New Testament failed to translate these words adequately into their language.
  
 
== Miltha ==
 
== Miltha ==

Revision as of 23:08, 30 March 2017

A philosophical debate continues between the Monophysites, the Nestorians, and the Eastern Orthodox as to the true "Nature of Christ”. And while this argument may seem insignificant, one shouldn't loose sight of the fact that millions of people have lost their lives, and many more have been exiled from their homes as the result of it.

To be clear, this is a problem of the Hellenized church, which does not directly effect Nazarani. That's because our view of the faith isn't based on a spiritual understanding of God, which has been passed down to us through the scriptures in their original Aramaic language, which is perfectly clear, and doesn't require hurdles of logic to fully understand.

There are a three Aramaic idioms which must understood before we can proceed. After all, the deaths of more than a million persons occurred because the Greek redactors of the New Testament failed to translate these words adequately into their language.

Miltha

In the beginning was the MILTHA, and the MILTHA was with God and God was that MILTHA.[1]

Miltha (Aramaic: מלתא) is an Aramaic idiom meaning simultaneously, "word", "manifestation", "instance" and "substance"[2].

MarYAH

John then tells us that God had existed in the world before Christ’s birth, but that the world did not know Him. [John 1:10] This of course can be no God other than YAH, since it was YAH (YHVH in Hebrew) who is also the creator of the world. YHWH is written as יהוה in Hebrew and sometimes in a short form Yah יה (yud-heh) appearing in places like Psalm 68:5 or as part of a compound Hebrew name like ירמיה (Yërëmyäh).

The Aramaic “MarYAH” is the emphatic form of the Aramaic theonym combining the words “Mar”, which means “Lord” and the word “YAH”, which is the abbreviated Aramaic form of the Hebrew Name of God, “YHWH”. The name YAH comes from the ancient Sumerian “EA” means "Life", and is derived from the Semitic root HYY "life", which can also mean "spring" or "running water", as in to say the “Fountain of Life”.

His Name is basically the singular, third person, masculine form of the verb HAYA, "to be". At the burning bush, He told Moses that His Name was "I AM", then He said His Name was "YHWH" (Ex.3:14-15). These are not separate Names, they are the same - He says "I AM", we say "HE IS"!

Ichidaya

“And we saw His glory, as the glory of the Ichidaya Who is of the Father Who is full of grace and truth.” [John 1:14] And no one can say YHWH is Y’shua (MarYah huwa Ieshu - [wvy wh ayrm) but by the Ruha aQdosh. (Here in Corinthians, it refers NOT to the Holy spirit, but to Prophecy. Thus, we who acknowledge the mission of Christ are ALL prophets.) - 1st Corinthians 12:3

“Jesus said to him, The first of all commandments is, Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God is one MarYAH” (Mark 12:29) “He said to them, How is it then that David through the spirit calls him Lord God MarYAH?” (Matthew 22:43) “For God sent the word to the children of Israel, preaching peace and tranquility by Jesus Christ; he is the MarYAH of all.” (Acts 10:36) “For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the MarYAH” (Luke 2:11) “That no man can say that Jesus is the MarYAH but by the Holy Spirit.” (1st Corinthians 12:3)

That Jesus is literally an incarnation of Life is not in question. “So you may know that I AM THE LIVING GOD”, as a stand alone statement occurs five times in John's Gospel at 8:24,28; 13:19, 18:6-8

Hundreds of soldiers who had come to arrest him were knocked down backwards when Yeshua answered with this two word phrase! This is testament to the fact that it meant more than, “It is I”; much more!

I AM the Living God

Combining the 30 occurrences of his statements- “I AM THE LIVING GOD”, with at least 32 places where Yeshua (Jesus) is named “THE LORD JEHOVAH” (or “YAHWEH”, if you prefer), yields 62 testimonies to The absolute Deity of The Messiah Yeshua in The Peshitta Aramaic New Testament not to be found in the Greek New Testament.

By removing the name “MarYAH” and replacing it with their pagan "Chrestos" the Greeks effectively stripped Jesus of His divinity, and removed any hope of understanding what is maybe the most basic point of the christological controversy, that

"... all of the House of Israel should know that this Yeshue, whom you crucified, is the anointed single LORD." - (Acts 2:36)

The True Nature is the Messiah

And so while Nazarani understand that Yeshue is, was, and will always be YHVH incarnate in the flesh. There are no natures, no need to invent qneuma, or persons, or other wills, actions or other philosophical innovations for understanding who He Is, or why He came.


References

  1. (John 1:1) The Bible Translated by Hadrian Mar Elijah Bar Israel
  2. Andrew Gabriel Roth, The Mystery of Miltha.